Face-off: Private Fiber vs. “Traditional” Wide Area Networks
02/28/2012 2 Comments
There are basically two types of wide area networks available today: private fiber networks and what we’ll refer to as a “traditional” network for this discussion. In a private fiber network, all buildings in the network are connected via a dedicated fiber optic link. A “traditional” network, on the other hand, connects each building to one another through the public cloud. Of course, there are advantages and disadvantages to each network.
Security
- Private fiber WAN
- Dedicated physical infrastructure ensures internal data does not pass through any public infrastructure, virtually eliminating any security threat.
- Network architecture allows for a single gateway to outside services such as voice, internet, etc. limiting external security risks.
- Traditional WAN
- All data, including internal data, passes through public switches. VPNs and other security techniques must be relied on to protect data integrity.
- Often, each location is a separate gateway to the public network enabling the possibility of outside security threats. Read more of this post
When asked to describe a private fiber wide area network (WAN) and particularly dark fiber WANs, I like to use the analogy of a train system. In this analogy, you have: